benchmarks reviews banner

ASUS Eee PC 1001P Reviews



ASUS Eee PC 1001P (XP Home) is priced at app. $299 (march 19 2010), is available in black and in white and has a 1024x600 10.1" LED Backlight Screen with Color-Shine. This netbook looks practically identical to the 1005PE-P.

CPU: Intel Atom Pineview-M N450

Below are the Cinebench benchmark results for this processor, next to the i5 520 mobile we also included two cheap desktop processors.

Processor
Cinebench R10 32 bit
(higher is better)
Intel Atom N450
870*
Intel Core i5 520M
6320*
Athlon II X2 240
4733*
Intel Pentium E6300
5390*

*Averages, results may vary depending on the motherboard and memory used.

Graphics: Integrated Intel GMA 3150

Below are the 3Dmark05 benchmark results for this processor, next to the ATI X1250 we also included a mainstream DirectX 11 desktop video card.

Internal Graphics Processor
3D mark 2005
(higher is better)
Intel GMA 3150
300**
Intel GMA 4500MHD
1230**
ATI Radeon Xpress X1250
1070**
ATI Radeon HD 5750
17573**

**Averages, results may vary depending on the processor and memory used.

More specs:
The dimensions: 10.3 x 7.0 x 1.4 inch and the weight is 2.8-pounds without the charger.
Touchpad: 2.5 x 1.4-inch without dedicated right and left buttons, a single mouse button must do the job.
Connectors on the left side: USB 2.0 port, a VGA port, and a Kensington lock slot.
Connectors on the right side: 2x USB 2.0 ports, 3-in-1 memory card reader, Ethernet port, a headphone and microphone jacks.

march 19 2010 review by laptopmag


ASUS Eee PC 1001P This netbook was compared to the ASUS 1005PE-P, Toshiba Mine NH305-N410 and the Dell Inspiron Mini 10.

Conclusion: The Eee PC 1001P held up well when performing everyday computing tasks. The reviewers liked the 1001P better than the 1005PE-P, because the 1001P avoid fingerprints and the keyboard feels larger. They prefer the more expensive Toshiba mini NB305 however, but with a smaller hard drive and 802.11b/g Wi-Fi, the 1001P is OK.

Heat: After playing a video at full screen for 15 minutes, the temperature of the touchpad was 91 degrees Fahrenheit and in between the G and H keys it was 90 degrees, above 95 degrees can be considerd unpleasant.

Display Quality: The LED-backlit display on the 1001P provided decent image quality with bright colors and the horizontal viewing angle was good.

HD Transfer Test: a 4.97GB mixed-media folder was transferd @ 17.5 MBps, 8.6 MBps slower than the 1005PE-P, which has a faster HDD.

Graphics: The Intel GMA 3150 integrated graphics chip delivered a score of 155 on 3DMark06 and A 720p video could be played back smoothly, using streaming video it stuttered from time to time when viewed @ full screen

Battery Life: The 1001P (4400-mAh) battery lasted for about 8:23 hours, three hours longer than the category average.

Benchmarks: 3DMark06, HD Transfer Test, Oxelon video transcoding, Geekbench, boot time, total watts to charge, charge time, outside heat on various spots, green efficiency rating.

march 19 2010 review by anandtech


ASUS Eee PC 1001P This netbook was compared to the Acer 1810T, Geteway EC5409u, Dell Inspiron 11z, ASUS 1201N & 1005PE and the HP mini 311 in the benchmarks.

Conclusion: This is a well built and good looking netbook with a very good non-reflective display LCD display, the battery life is OK, and still remains a netbook, which means small, light but very slow. Allthough it got the 'Editiors choice' his final thoughts were: If your want a low price, small size and a long battery life and a slow performance, this netbook will do OK, but for approximately a hundred dollars more you'll have an 11.6" CULV machine like the Gateway EC14 or an Acer Aspire 1410 which are a lot faster.

Display Quality: there is a dedicated page for this notebooks's LCD Quality, which showed that it was extremely good in contrast and black level, but was the last in color accuracy and white level, compared to the 1005PE it has a better screen.

Battery life: The battery is less than the 1005PE, the 1001P is smaller and has a 48Wh battery instead of a 63Wh. In the x264 bench the 1005PE lasted for 376 minutes while the 1001P was empty after 319 minutes. On the other hand the 1001P has the same relative battery life.

Benchmarks: LCD Color Accuracy, PCmark Vantage, 3Dmark2005 & 2006, PCmark05, Video Encoding x264, Cinebench.

        

Search this site:


Categories:
































eXTReMe Tracker
HOME :: GRAPHICS CARDS :: MEMORY :: NOTEBOOKS :: PROCESSORS :: CONTACT